mirror of
https://codeberg.org/grunfink/snac2.git
synced 2024-11-10 03:50:38 +03:00
Updated TODO.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c04f4a2ccc
commit
b4c394b050
8
TODO.md
8
TODO.md
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Open
|
||||
|
||||
Implement bulleted lists.
|
||||
Implement bulleted lists. Mastodon is crap and won't show them, but other instances (Friendica, Pleroma) will do.
|
||||
|
||||
Add a purge timeout also for the local timeline.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -12,13 +12,11 @@ Implement HTTP caches (If-None-Match / ETag).
|
||||
|
||||
The 'history' pages are now just monthly snapshots of the local timeline. This is ok and cheap and easy, but is problematic if you e.g. delete a post because it will be there in the history forever.
|
||||
|
||||
Create the `mastodon2snac` helper program (reading directly from the boxes, not using any exported data).
|
||||
|
||||
Add an RSS to the local timeline.
|
||||
|
||||
Implement hashtags.
|
||||
Implement hashtags. They are not very useful, as they can only be implemented as instance-only (not propagated), but it may help classifiying your own posts.
|
||||
|
||||
Idea for a new disk layout: timelines stored like in git (2 character directories and then the md5.json inside); one append-only index with entry ids, read backwards (easy because md5 binary ids measure the same); children lists as append-only files stored inside the timeline directories with almost the same names as the parent entry; liked-by and announced-by lists as append-only files of actor ids. No _snac metadata inside the message. (But, what about the referrer? With this layout, do I need it?).
|
||||
Idea for a new disk layout: timelines stored like in git (2 character directories and then the md5.json inside); one append-only index with entry ids, read backwards (easy because md5 binary ids measure the same); children lists as append-only files stored inside the timeline directories with almost the same names as the parent entry; liked-by and announced-by lists as append-only files of actor ids. No _snac metadata inside the message (But, what about the referrer? With this layout, do I need it?). The instance storage may even be global, not per user; this could help in very bing instances (but will this be a use-case for snac? not probably).
|
||||
|
||||
## Closed
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user